Sometimes I still feel like we’re in 1982 when it comes to really basic things like turning off a computer. Why do we have to select shutdown from a menu? Why do we have to carefully save each open file? Why don’t programs stop when we tell them to? (Time Machine has now been spinning for hours, and won’t stop even though I’ve told it to.) Why is this so much more complex than it needs to be?
In the future, here’s how shutdown should work:
- You flip the power switch.
That’s it. No shutdown menu item. No wait for the system to hibernate. No opportunity for applications to save data. Nothing.
Read the rest of this entry »
This entry was posted
on Friday, January 16th, 2009 at 10:24 am and is filed under User Interface.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the Atom feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
I’m doing a bit of work on XOM, trying to optimize and improve some of the Unicode normalization code. A lot of this is autogenerated from the Unicode data files, and I’m actually working on the meta-code that parses those files and then generates the actual shipping code. In this code, I’m setting up a switch
statement like this one:
switch(i) {
case 0:
return result + "NOT_REORDERED";
case 1:
return result + "OVERLAY";
case 7:
return result + "NUKTA";
case 8:
return result + "KANA_VOICING";
case 9:
return result + "VIRAMA";
case 202:
return result + "ATTACHED_BELOW";
case 216:
return result + "ATTACHED_ABOVE_RIGHT";
case 218:
return result + "BELOW_LEFT";
case 220:
return result + "BELOW";
case 222:
return result + "BELOW_RIGHT";
case 224:
return result + "LEFT";
case 226:
return result + "RIGHT";
case 228:
return result + "ABOVE_LEFT";
case 230:
return result + "ABOVE";
case 232:
return result + "ABOVE_RIGHT";
case 233:
return result + "DOUBLE_BELOW";
case 234:
return result + "DOUBLE_ABOVE";
case 240:
return result + "IOTA_SUBSCRIPT";
default:
return result + "NOT_REORDERED";
}
And then I stop myself. Do you see the bug? Actually it’s a meta bug that leads to the true bug.
Read the rest of this entry »
This entry was posted
on Monday, January 12th, 2009 at 11:22 am and is filed under Programming.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the Atom feed.
You can make a comment or trackback from your own site.
C-family languages including Java, C#, and C++ do not require braces around single line blocks. For example, this is a legal loop:
for (int i=0; i < args.length; i++) process(args[i]);
So’s this:
for (int i=0; i < args.length; i++)
process(args[i]);
However both of these are very bad form, and lead to buggy code. All blocks in C-like languages should be explicitly delimited by braces across multiple lines in all cases. Here’s why:
Read the rest of this entry »
This entry was posted
on Thursday, January 1st, 2009 at 2:07 pm and is filed under Programming.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the Atom feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.